>>> "Eileen Liska"
<eliska01@comcast.net > 09/14/04 01:47PM >>>
9/14
Hi ,
Finally getting back to you on the gas euthanasia question. I discussed this
at length with the Director of MHS Clinics.
On the whole he concurs with the opinion I shared with you from the animal
rights vet (DVM VanKoevering).
In 99% of cases, the most humane method is intravenous injection with sodium
pentobarbital. However, Dr.Fisher says that many wild animals, exotic
animals, and highly aggressive or agitated animals would have to be placed in
a squeeze cage in order to get the needle into them (as they cannot be held
down by people). In such cases, with them moving around in the cage even with
confinement, they can get poked multiple times and that only raises the stress
and fear levels. For such animals, being placed alone in a dark, quiet
chamber with the gas cooled and pumped in slowly is far more humane for them.
The other cases where a gas chamber, or for small animals a glass container,
is more humane would be animals that have health issues that inhibit the
ability of their circulatory system to absorb the sodium pentobarbital quickly
enough.
When the MDA Comm. the MHS and I participate in starts re-writing the state
law on euthanasia (it's on our "To Do" list), I will be sure that we
dramatically update andstrengthen the language so people cannot use chambers
routinely anymore (or barrels with monoxide piped in, or gun shot). This has
been a big concern to us for a long time.
Make sure you stay involved in our legislative work so you will know when we
start working on this reform.
Eileen